Ethiopian Air Force unexpected attack

Many companies, especially small, are integrated into their local communities with lots of ties, which makes decision-making more "charged", that is, decision-making is limited by social factors. In many cases, discussions on corporation's responsibility refer to these phenomena (Vilke 2011 B, 2014) or to those who direct corporations to deliberate how to comply with such restrictions (McWilliams and Siegel 2000). However, even if these are important, useful and valuable, they are not suitable ethical.

However, people in people similar to businesses in general, have several different interest types, and as humans they also have ethical responsibilities. Many entrepreneurs have several opportunities through which to pursue the objective they have, as well as the goals loaded with ethics. Friedman believed that companies should be executed according to the rules of business games and that players should be seen as human individuals who are committed to ethics. In this sense, Friedman seems to be committed to methodological individualism. Ethics takes place in a real society and the level of cultivation determines how easy or difficult it is for people to behave ethically.

On bankruptcy and ethics

Sometimes it is said that ethics is a good business (see, for example, Joyner and Payne 2002). The idea is that it is good that companies are ethical, which can be supported by empirical evidence. However, such evidence does not do the desired work. Ethics is not a topic that can be presented to empirical evidence; Ethics comes before all possible tests: characterizes good behavior and kindness in humans. Sometimes, ethics can lead to useful consequences and at some point not, but empirical evidence is not "crucial experiments" [3]. There is another reason, so there can be no empirical evidence supporting the belief that ethics is good for business.